A newly calibrated genomic mutation clock shows koala numbers falling to about a tenth of their peak roughly 100,000 years ago, tens of thousands of years before humans are thought to have set foot on the continent.
Earlier studies concluded that koala numbers fell after modern humans arrived in Australia around 65,000 years ago, but those estimates borrowed mutation rates from distantly related mammals — mainly humans and mice.1 The new study measured the koala's own mutation rate directly, sequencing four parent-offspring trios, and found it runs at roughly half the human rate.1 Applying that koala-specific clock to 457 wild genomes from across the species' five surviving populations produced a markedly different demographic picture.1
Modelled this way, koala numbers grew for hundreds of thousands of years, then entered a severe, prolonged decline roughly 100,000–120,000 years ago — estimates vary slightly depending on the statistical method used — falling to about a tenth of their peak size by around 60,000 years ago.1 That is tens of thousands of years before humans are thought to have reached the continent, in a window most commonly dated to between 65,000 and 47,000 years ago.1
The timing points to a cause other than people. The decline coincides with the onset of the most recent glacial period, when Australia grew colder and drier and forest habitat fragmented across the continent.1 Around 70,000 years ago the Nullarbor Plain dried into semi-arid shrubland, splitting a once-continuous range into an eastern population — ancestor of every koala alive today — and a western one that later died out.2 The study's authors point to this climate-driven habitat loss, not human arrival, as the more likely driver of the crash.1
PSMC and SMC++, the two coalescent methods used, agree the decline predates human arrival but disagree on its precise shape and timing — and neither can fully separate a genuine drop in population size from reduced gene flow as populations became isolated from one another; the study's authors say both processes probably acted together.1 The date humans first reached Australia is itself debated among archaeologists, with credible estimates spanning close to 20,000 years; a later arrival date would narrow the gap described above, though not close it.1
Left out here to hold length: